2020 Hyundai Veloster Quarter Mile Time First Drive – 2020 hyundai veloster quarter mile time
When Hyundai ripped the area off its new Hyundai Veloster at the 2011 Detroit auto show, acknowledgment ranged from “WTF?!?” to “WOW!!!” The bizarro-world bear with the aberrant name and the third aperture has been both admired and laughed at anytime since. Whatever you ability anticipate about it, the point is you’ve been thinking/arguing/commenting, so Hyundai’s apparently blessed — aloof accomplish abiding you spell Veloster right.
Sadly, there wasn’t abundant birr to go forth with the Veloster’s blue flash, as we begin out during our analysis of it aftermost year. Thankfully, that affair has been addressed with accession of the 2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo, a car that now has the added action to adhere with the brand of the VW GTI and Honda Civic Si.
The Turbo is alike flashier on the outside, acknowledgment to a anatomy kit; a glossy rear diffuser alternate by center-mounted bankrupt tips (we could do after the cool annular reflectors at anniversary ancillary of the rear end); blade-look rims with chrome accents; and a blacked-out, trapezoidal, gaping-maw grille — the alone affair missing is a behemothic fishhook. There are additionally LED lighting accents advanced and rear. The Turbo is additionally accessible with an absolute matte gray acrylic advantage for $1000. You accept to absolutely appetite it, as it takes a agglomeration of added affliction to accumulate it attractive pristine, but it looks dynamite.
We collection the Veloster Turbo for several hundred miles, on arduous Southern California coulee anchorage and traffic-choked highways, and for a brace of spins about an autocross track. Back we were done with that, we took it out and gave it a acceptable ol’ ancient MT analysis flogging. So how hot is this hatch? Warm to the touch, but not scalding.
The Veloster Turbo’s ability comes via Hyundai’s direct-injected, 1.6-liter I-4 adapted with a twin-scroll turbocharger with a max 18 psi of boost, pumping out 201 application and 195 lb-ft, and it drinks approved unleaded. Our analysis Veloster was able with the easy-to-operate six-speed manual; it’s additionally accessible with a six-speed automated featuring a action approach advised to acuminate the shifts. What isn’t accessible yet is the DCT dual-clutch automated alternative on the abject Veloster, as it hasn’t been optimized to handle the Turbo’s torque. We sampled both chiral and auto gearboxes during our drive. While our absence ambience is to row it ourselves, the automated (paddle shifters are affixed) did a appropriate job of laying bottomward the power, although it accepted a bit apathetic at times.
Surprisingly, above the turbocharger, Hyundai engineers didn’t absolutely accumulation on the performance-themed updates. There were aught upgrades to the abject car’s suspension, but 18-inch auto are now standard. Hyundai’s council feel has been a admired punching bag for auto journo types, so the Veloster Turbo’s council adjustment has been anchored up (now 13.9 from 14.2) and added adjustment was done in an accomplishment to abode the issue. And the advanced discs are .8-inch bigger. That’s it. Hyundai engineers were assured that the Veloster’s platform, which is different to the car, was already acquainted plenty. That, or they’re captivation aback for an R-Spec version.
In any event, the Veloster Turbo performed almost able-bodied during our on-road drive. Turn-in is absolutely bigger over the abject car, although it still takes a fair bulk of alteration to accumulate it in band back the corners bind up, and it can get hardly active over asperous pavement. There’s allowance for improvement, abnormally back you accede the far added mature, multi-generational platforms basement cars like GTI and Civic Si coupe. With that, let’s go to the numbers.
When we aboriginal activated the abject Veloster aftermost year, it pulled a .83 on the skidpad and bashed through our amount eight at 27.3 sec at .63 g (avg) on the alternative 18-inch tire/wheel setup. Given the added ability and the accepted 18-inch package, we accepted those numbers to get better, but they came out about the same. The Turbo recorded a 27.2 abnormal at 0.67 g run, and .82 g on the skidpad. Both the GTI and Si we activated performed better, affairs the aforementioned .87 g crabbed accel numbers. The GTI recorded a figure-eight run of 26.3 abnormal at .67, with the Si appropriate abaft it at 26.6 abnormal at .66. The analysis aggregation did address that the Veloster Turbo’s tires weren’t behaving all that able-bodied during the runs, so hardly bigger numbers may be possible.
At the dragstrip, the Veloster Turbo afar itself from its artlessly aspirated sibling, recording a 6.9-second 0-to-60 mph time on to 15.2 abnormal at 93.4 mph in the division mile. But that’s a continued way off from both the GTI (6.1-second 0-to-60, 14.7 at 95.8 mph division with the DSG transmission) and the Si auto (6.1-second 0-to-60, 14.7 at 95.7 mph division with the six-speed manual). Back it came time to bang the Veloster’s brakes from 60 mph, it took 123 anxiety to booty it down, appropriate with the GTI (124 feet) and Si (121 feet).
The analysis aggregation appear some issues accepting the car to barrage properly, and encountered lots of caster hop. Dropping the clamp at 2800 rpm angry in the best times. In addition, they accomplished some aberrant ability commitment issues beneath acute acceleration, abnormally while flat-footing it in third gear. We didn’t appointment annihilation agnate in our our real-world drives.
But as is the case with Hyundais in general, the achievement numbers aren’t the absolute story. Take the autogenous blueprint and amenities, for example. Not abundant in the berth has afflicted from the abject Veloster, added than hardly adapted seats with bigger bolstering and Turbo stitching, and a trim allotment or two. But that’s OK, because it was already a well-executed adjustment to start, with its arresting V-shaped centermost assemblage accessible with Hyundai’s accomplished 7-inch aeronautics and infotainment setup, a rear-view camera, accepted Blue Link telematics, and able stowage and accessory ascribe placement. And at $22,725 to alpha with the chiral and $26,225 for the absolutely loaded automatic, it’s priced some $2000 cheaper than both the Si and GTI with agnate amenities.
Space-wise, the Veloster’s 15.5 cubic-feet of burden accommodation with the rear seats up and 89.8 cubic-feet of absolute commuter amplitude calmly best the Civic auto (11.7/82.6), although the GTI two-door (15.3/93.5) acme it in the all-embracing cubes department. We had no absolute issues applicable into the Veloster’s cabin, and that third aperture no agnosticism comes in accessible for back-seaters.
It’s no challenge in the MPG arena. The Veloster Turbo (26/38 manual, 25/34 automatic) spanks both the GTI two-door (21/31 manual, 24/32 automatic) and the Civic Si (22/31 chiral only) in the EPA’s eyes. And as ahead mentioned, the Veloster Turbo gets those numbers on approved fuel, while the GTI and Si both alcohol premium. And of course, the Veloster’s stick-out-like-a-sore-thumb appearance will get you added play, both absolute and negative, than the GTI and Si combined.
In the end, it’s a catechism of priorities. If you appetite the hottest bear you can buy, you’d best attending elsewhere. But if value, anxious style, and MPGs agency in aloof as much, again the Veloster Turbo may be your admission to ride.