2020 Hyundai Genesis Spesification – 2020 Hyundai Genesis
Cars.com photo by Christian Lantry
The redesigned BMW 3 Series is backward to the activity — a brawl that saw the all-new 2019 Genesis G70 win the night. A few months afterwards we gave our accomplished anniversary accolade to the newest auto from Hyundai’s beginning affluence division, its German battling hit dealerships with a seventh-generation redesign in the anatomy of the 330i for 2019 and M340i for 2020. Now, finally, we’ve had a adventitious to analyze them by evaluating four- and six-cylinder versions of anniversary over a multiday analysis comprised of artery driving, abstinent dispatch and braking testing, and a baby administration course. Consumers boutique by price, so our allegory primarily affable into the two sedans that abatement abutting in that regard: the six-cylinder G70 3.3T ($51,225) and the four-cylinder 330i with M Action Package ($57,420). All prices accommodate destination.
Related: 2019 BMW 330i Review: Now Added Machine Than Man
Purists are abiding to cramp because we put a six-cylinder up adjoin a four-banger, but engines aside, both cars acquire all-wheel drive, all-season tires and action suspensions afterwards adaptive shock absorbers, characteristics we acquainted important to bout up area the added cars did not acquire parity. Managing Editor Joe Bruzek and I graded 17 categories to acquisition a winner, and we afterwards explain area the $44,895 G70 2.0T and $69,570 M340i fit in to this affluence auto mash-up.
The above-mentioned 330i was third quickest amid six rivals two years ago, hitting 60 mph in 6.1 abnormal in our tests. Its almsman adds a few dozen pounds of barrier weight, but BMW’s turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder is rated with 7 added application and 37 added pounds-feet of torque (to 255 hp and 295 pounds-feet), all of which makes the redesigned 330i arise essentially quicker. Using BMW’s barrage ascendancy in our AWD analysis car, 0-60 mph happened in aloof 5.59 seconds, and our best run through the quarter-mile clocked 14.17 abnormal at 99.4 mph. Adeptness from the 2.0-liter plateaus a bit as the agent approaches redline, but BMW’s eight-speed automated rips off blinding-fast, brittle upshifts to alpha the action anew. All told, the 330i is quick.
It can’t bout the G70’s turbocharged 3.3-liter V-6, however. Alike saddled with a lot added weight — as-tested 3,965 pounds adjoin the BMW’s 3,670 — the engine’s 75-hp advantage makes up for it.
With 376 pounds-feet of torque, the G70 launches hard, with broad, bland adeptness that builds a little added linearly than in the 330i. Upshifts are a little slower from its eight-speed automatic, but the added adeptness added than makes up for it. Our best runs with barrage ascendancy clocked 4.81 abnormal to 60 mph and 13.10 abnormal through the quarter-mile at 107.6 mph, almost a abounding additional quicker in either absorption than the 330i. That’s a avant-garde gulf.
2019 Genesis G70 3.3T AWD ($51,225)
2019 BMW 330i AWD ($57,420)
Although the G70 has 295 pounds’ added barrier weight over the BMW, its Brembo brakes — included on all V-6 models — chock-full it from 60 mph in aloof 121.6 feet, a stone’s bandy from the 330i’s 123.7 feet. Both cars apparent beeline pedal response, no disproportionate yaw and bound anchor achromatize over again efforts. We advised this class a draw.
In our burghal analysis loop, the 3.3-liter G70 delivered smooth, actual adeptness off the band with acceptable manual kickdown if you columnist the accelerator while in motion. We advised the 330i’s automated alike quicker on downshifts, but BMW’s atrophy charcoal a case of apparent accelerator lag from a stop — a adjournment that’s almost absent in the G70’s V-6. The G70 didn’t aloof acquire added power; it served it up sooner.
A longtime 3 Series complaint is aloof council feedback, a action that still plagues the redesign. The caster has a asleep on-center feel, and antecedent turn-in is sleepier than the G70’s ultra-quick response. But things change badly already you alpha wheeling into a corner. The 330i’s alternative capricious action council — allotment of the able M Action Package, forth with a sport-tuned abeyance — tightens up appreciably to acuminate the car’s reflexes at speed. At the banned of grip, dynamics are sublime; the council is brittle and responsive, and the adenoids turns as agilely as a committed sports car’s. On the autocross, the 330i displayed outstanding neutrality, its appendage sliding (even with all-wheel drive) with affluence of admonishing and accessible adjustability. The 330i hardly gets abroad from you; the car rotates as alluringly as annihilation we’ve activated in contempo history, with a abreast clear-sighted adeptness to cross our baby administration course.
The G70 does not. It’s far from an autocross mismatch, but it’s not about as fun or capable. Council has bigger antecedent feedback, added acerbity and quicker turn-in, but anatomy cycle is boundless alike with the alternative sport-tuned suspension. (Adaptive shocks are a added option, but our G70 didn’t acquire them.) Alternating the G70 about our cone advance was a acting affair, acute lots of gas and reactive, amber council to action understeer by way of the tail. Pressed too hard, the car snaps about accidental — a addiction hardly accomplished in the BMW. Our analysis car’s Michelin Primacy all-season tires howled in beef the accomplished time, while the 330i’s Bridgestone Turanza all-seasons accepted cooperative. By day’s end, the autocross had eaten the Michelins’ avant-garde footstep blocks for lunch, while the Bridgestones emerged in acceptable shape.
BMW claims alert as abundant aberration in damping armament amid abject and M Action suspensions adjoin the approachable 3 Series, a archetypal sometimes criticized for activity too soft. Nobody will anticipate that of the redesign: The anatomy is abutting as a tightrope, surrendering about no crabbed anatomy movement over hardscrabble pavement — article the G70 exhibits, admitting aloof slightly. Unfortunately, the M Action abeyance is as abutting as they come. The M Action abeyance avant-garde came accepted alone on rear-wheel-drive 3 Series with the M Action Package, abrogation all-wheel-drive M Sports with the abject suspension. Now, the as-tested M Action Package with AWD has the M Action abeyance standard, and its affability swings berserk the added way of “base.” On avenue covers or amplification joints, shock assimilation is all shock, no absorption. Added configurations ability advance on things, but the M Action Package’s abeyance has acquired into a rather acute upgrade. With 18-inch auto (versus the 330i’s 19s) and a action suspension, the G70 acquits itself artlessly by accepting a atom of ride abundance at all. It wins easily.
Choppy ride aside, the 330i is almost quiet at canoeing speeds, with beneath wind and alley babble than the G70. The Genesis develops a abrasive annoy babble at all speeds, article we didn’t beam in the 330i. BMW wins this category.
The G70 has its allotment of cheaper abstracts beneath arm level, but it beats BMW in best added areas. Lavish berth accessories accommodate a stitched vinyl blanket over abundant of the dashboard; Genesis’ alternative Nappa covering upholstery beats the snot out of the 330i’s asperous alternative cowhide (simulated covering is standard), and best controls accomplish with fine-tuned precision. By contrast, the 3 Series shows apparent amount acid adjoin its predecessor, with added hard-touch surfaces and phoned-in controls. Genesis is trending in the adverse administration of BMW here.
Our 330i’s action seats feel like a collection of overstuffed cushions attached together, but it has the bright bend in roominess. Despite its added 0.9 inch of exoteric width, the G70’s berth feels narrow, hemming your legs amid a aerial centermost animate and blubbery doors. Allowance is the G70’s bigger problem, acute both of us to sit lower than we’d like in our moonroof-equipped analysis car. The 330i with a moonroof suffers none of these ills.
Like the avant-garde seats, the rear bank wins in roominess. Seating acme is agnate amid the two cars, but we begin a little added knee approval and a lot added allowance in aback of the BMW. Area the G70’s beam tapers, the 3 Series stays upright; adults should acquire no agitation sitting calmly in back.
Both cars acquire center-console cubbies avant-garde of the cupholders, but neither is ideal: The 330i’s is harder to admission but the G70’s allows too abundant to accelerate out, which happens frequently because the G70’s agent is acquisitive to amuse and quick to respond. The G70 has roomier borders beneath the centermost armrest and in the cuff compartment; it additionally has an aerial sunglasses holder. The 330i does not, but it has added accessible aperture pockets and a benefit accommodation to the larboard of the council wheel. It’s a draw.
It’s bright that both automakers’ trunk-volume claims — BMW quotes 17.0 cubic feet, Genesis claims 10.5 cubic anxiety — appear from alternating realities, as manufacturer-stated burden specs don’t generally acquaint the accomplished story. The 330i does not acquire annihilation abutting to 62 percent added baggage allowance than the G70. But it does acquire sizably more. By our barometer tape, both trunks acquire agnate abyss from the aback point to the seatbacks and amplitude amid the caster wells, but the 330i has essentially added height, with 20 inches adjoin 17 inches to the trunk’s aerial point; that’s about 20 percent more. BMW additionally has added able backseat folding (40/20/40 adjoin the G70’s 60/40), with a added aperture aback folded.
Cars.com photo by Christian Lantry
Cars.com photo by Kelsey Mays
Both cars acquire wireless smartphone charging, but the 330i is amid a scattering of models with wireless Apple CarPlay. The G70, like best cars, requires a concrete binding for CarPlay to work. The 330i additionally has one added USB anchorage (four adjoin three), and three of its ports are the added avant-garde USB-C type. In the G70, all ports are the accepted USB-A. So why doesn’t the 330i calmly win the category? Two words: Android Auto. BMW needs to get with the affairs on it, as no Bavarian models abutment Android Auto for the 2019 or 2020 archetypal years. That’s a deal-breaker for those with an Android smartphone. Addition beating adjoin the BMW is that CarPlay requires an anniversary fee afterwards the antecedent chargeless trial; in the G70, Android Auto is accepted and CarPlay free. That brings this class aback to a tie.
The 3 Series has beyond displays, with a 10.25-inch touchscreen and 12.3-inch basic gauges in our analysis car adjoin the G70’s 8-inch touchscreen and 7-inch barometer display. But the 3 Series’ controls are an exercise in accidental complexity. Buttons on the centermost animate allotment amplitude on collapsed panels, acute too abundant absorption to feel out on the fly. The altitude controls sit in a tiny pod amid the air vents. The headlight buttons are aloof that — buttons! — instead of a aboveboard knob. The cyberbanking accessory selector has unintuitive detents and a tiny Park button. We could go on.
The G70 has abate displays with lower resolution, but its controls are aggregate BMW’s are not. Simple, ample dials administer climate, and beneath the touchscreen are large, bright controls. The accessory selector batten is still electronic, but its detents are cleaner, and the Park button is adamantine to miss. For its auspicious simplicity, the G70 gets this one.
The aforementioned roofline that grants added allowance in aback of the 330i makes for taller backseat windows to aid over-the-shoulder visibility. Likewise, BMW’s rear window is beyond than the G70’s baby pane.
Both cars acquire accomplished crash-test ratings (see the 330i’s actuality and the G70’s here) and a abounding accompaniment of accepted crash-avoidance technology. But the 330i ekes out a win for a few accessory upgrades, things like alive side-collision abstention (which can administer council to accumulate you from aberration into adjoining traffic) and a higher-resolution advancement camera.
As-tested, both cars acquire adaptive cruise ascendancy that works bottomward to a stop, but the 330i stands out as one of aloof a few cars industrywide with hands-free steering, address of BMW’s Extended Cartage Jam Assistant. Included on our analysis car, ETJA can centermost the 330i in its lane during artery cartage at speeds up to 40 mph afterwards defective you to authority the wheel; hands-on lane absorption takes over aloft 40 mph. The G70 doesn’t alike acquire low-speed lane centering, abundant beneath a hands-free system, admitting its lane accumulate abetment does an admirable job of allowance to accumulate the car centered afterwards pinballing off the lane markers.
Reflecting its accent amid consumers, our amount class carries bifold weighting in this comparison, as it does in our class-wide Challenges. And this challenge isn’t alike close: The 2019 G70 starts at $35,895 and acme out about $52,500 with all its branch options. The 2019-20 3 Series, by contrast, starts in the low $40,000s and acme out about an agitative $70,000. The cheapest M340i is aloof shy of $55,000 — bags added than alike a factory-loaded G70 3.3T.
For their as-tested prices, our 330i had added technology but beneath animal comforts. The G70 had acrimonious rear seats, cooled avant-garde seats and a power-adjustable council column, all appearance missing in the 330i, and it amount $6,195 less. Both cars acquire three years’ chargeless maintenance, but Genesis augments that with a account aide and an accomplished warranty. The 330i’s bottom adeptness comes with far bigger ammunition abridgement but requires at atomic mid-grade (89-octane) fuel. Both cars acclaim exceptional for max performance, but the G70 can run accomplished on the bargain stuff.
Cars.com photo by Christian Lantry
Overall Winner: BMW 330i
Out of 17 categories judged, the 330i almost won, demography eight categories over the G70’s seven-equivalent (six additional bifold weighting for value). The cars angry in three added categories. You apprehend that right: Cars.com’s Best of 2019 agent absent a head-to-head allegory test. But, abundant like our classwide comparisons that end up close, this is beneath about which car is bigger and added about how your needs could amplitude you in either direction. The 330i plays on dynamics, technology and space; the 3.3-liter G70 boasts acceleration, account and value.
But what if money is no object, or if you appetite a affluence car on a budget? Apprehend on.
Bookending the cars we focused on were two added variants, with an M340i at the aerial end and a four-cylinder G70 on the amount front. Both aflame what a lot of added money can get you — or what a lot of accumulation will sacrifice.
The M340i is nuts. It’s the alone way to currently get a six-cylinder 3 Series, and its turbo 3.0-liter six-cylinder makes 382 hp and 369 pounds-feet of torque, which is agnate achievement to the G70’s turbo V-6. The results, however, are annihilation but similar. We doubtable BMW rated the M340i conservatively: With barrage control, our AWD analysis car accursed through 60 mph in an batty 3.89 seconds, essentially quicker than the aftermost M4 auto we tested. The M340i accelerates with violent, amazing force, ripping through aboriginal apparatus in the blink of an eye. Adeptness was still architecture as we tore through the quarter-mile in 12.15 abnormal at 113.9 mph, with no signs of alternation at aerial speeds. This car is crazy-quick.
Despite addition 210 pounds’ barrier weight over the 330i, the M340i is still a force to be reckoned with on the autocross. With summer tires and an electronically controlled M Action rear cogwheel — a affection our 330i didn’t acquire — the M340i feels appropriately neutral. The added adeptness enables easier on-throttle oversteer, but the M340i hardly feels like it will get abroad from you. It takes all the fun of the 330i and adds bags added adeptness for acceptable measure.
2020 BMW M340i AWD ($69,570)
The four-cylinder G70 goes the adverse direction. With rear-wheel drive but our admired tires in the accumulation — Michelin Pilot Action 4 high-performance summers — our 2.0-liter G70 sticks like cement on the autocross but not gracefully, as the car actually leans on the tires to accomplish the best of it because the abeyance isn’t alms abundant control. Already it alcove the banned of grip, the adenoids pushes hard. As with the 3.3-liter G70, alternating the 2.0-liter car requires a lot of mid-corner gas and fast, antidotal council as the appendage assuredly snaps around. A 3 Series, this is not.
2019 Genesis G70 2.0T RWD ($44,895)
Nor does it blow any alternative of the BMW on the annoyance strip. Genesis’ turbo 2.0-liter (252 hp, 260 pounds-feet of torque) restricts abundant of its adeptness to college revs, and the slow-shifting automated does no favors bottomward the stretch. Using barrage control, we clocked 60 mph in 6.45 abnormal and the quarter-mile in 14.71 abnormal at 94.8 mph, both essentially slower than the 2.0-liter 3 Series. Specs don’t acquaint the abounding story: On the strip, the four-cylinder G70 is annihilation to address home about.
Fortunately, you don’t acquire to. Our well-equipped G70 amount about as abundant as a abject G70 with the 3.3-liter V-6 ($44,745), and the V-6 is hardly a bare car at that. G70 shoppers should skip added options to bounce for the bigger engine; it’s account it.
More From Cars.com:
Cars.com’s Editorial administration is your antecedent for automotive account and reviews. In band with Cars.com’s abiding belief policy, editors and reviewers don’t acquire ability or chargeless trips from automakers. The Editorial administration is absolute of Cars.com’s advertising, sales and sponsored agreeable departments.